4 ms·
Yep, as usual, prepare salt before you read _any_ programming languages blog post. My case was against Ruby back when Rails was hot. Ditto with JavaScript nowa
by hello_moto 15y ago
Yep, as usual, prepare salt before you read _any_ programming languages blog post.
My case was against Ruby back when Rails was hot. Ditto with JavaScript nowadays.
Ruby 1.9 has been out for production for almost 3 years? Cool, how come it's slower than 1.8.7? (not trying to offend Ruby but I use Rails 3.1 with Ruby 1.9, running unit-tests are dog-gone slow).
- kennystone 15y ago1.9 is way faster than 1.8. I think you are confusing Ruby's speed versus Rails speed.
- petercooper 15y agoRuby 1.9 has been out for production for almost 3 years? Cool, how come it's slower than 1.8.7? It's not. File loading in 1.9.2 is notoriously slow and you're probably encountering a common case where mid to large scale Rails 3 apps are loading so many files at runtime that you're hitting it. Everything else is bright and breezy. The story behind much of this: http://www.rubyinside.com/ruby-1-9-3-faster-loading-times-require-4927.html http://www.rubyinside.com/ruby-1-9-3-faster-loading-times-re... - Most people are experiencing significant speedups with 1.9.3 so far but it hasn't had its final release yet. That aside, speed isn't everything. Python 3 was (is?) slower than Python 2 for quite some time, despite being in production.
- sunkencity 15y agoThat is file loading as in loading ruby source files. A problem aggravated by rails being refactored to be actually readable, but many more files.