3 ms·
...over the speed limit, yes. The point of parent's post is that the offensive nature of a statement or speech in general is subjective and can change with whim
by michaelscott 5y ago
...over the speed limit, yes. The point of parent's post is that the offensive nature of a statement or speech in general is subjective and can change with whims and the time. A speed limit is objective and quantifiable; if you go over the speed limit stated you get fined, there's no room for interpretation
- Pyramus 5y agoSpeed limits are not objective at all - Germany infamously does not have speed limits on highways. And yes, speed limit laws, do change over time. And no, you can't be punished for having broken a speed limit in the past, that is not in effect today. Parent's comparison seems rather apt.
- hervature 5y agoThey obviously meant speed is quantifiable. You can measure speed and say "you violated the limit".
- Pyramus 5y agoYes, but it doesn't strengthen the argument. If society A says the speed limit is X and society B it's Y and society C it's infinite. What's the point that speed is objectively measurable?
- hervature 5y agoThat making a rule even makes sense. It is not an argument as to what amount is sensible, just that "amount" is sensible.
- refurb 5y agoYou’re missing the point. Society A and society B won’t disagree on whether something is moving at 150km/hr.
- endominus 5y agoWell, they might if a physicist gets involved and starts complaining that no one has defined their point of reference.