> Then there are those who think AGI is impossible in principle. Yes. I don't believe that it is impossible in principle either, but it is neither trivial to a

> Then there are those who think AGI is impossible in principle. Yes. I don't believe that it is impossible in principle either, but it is neither trivial to argue that it is possible. An argument that annoys me to no end is this "well, AI continues to get better (there is no regression in our capability), and therefore it must sooner or later exceed any given threshold, for example human level AGI. QED." That argument is just plain wrong. The world record in the 100-metre dash is only ever improving, but that doesn't mean that humans will soon run Mach 1.