3 ms·
"Getting through life" is not the correct benchmark. An autonomous system that merely wipes out all of humanity is by definition a superior intelligence, and I
by SheinhardtWigCo 5y ago
"Getting through life" is not the correct benchmark. An autonomous system that merely wipes out all of humanity is by definition a superior intelligence, and I would argue that no major breakthrough is needed to create such a thing; just resources. It doesn't matter how long that thing can self-sustain after annihilating us. A win is a win.
- lovich 5y agoAre stars and other stellar phenomena a superior intelligence to humanity? They are autonomous systems that could easily wipe us all out
- rawoke083600 5y ago> An autonomous system that merely wipes out all of humanity is by definition a superior intelligence I think you got stuck on semantics and missing the forest for the trees, with all due the respect. >Getting through the next 30 seconds Might not be "the final" or "best benchmark" but I'd argue it's a damn good problem to solve on the way to discovering true AI and GAI.
- Animats 5y agoAll the mammals have roughly similar brain architecture. The same components seem to be present, in different quantities. If we can get into the low-end mammal range of AI, we're most of the way there. So if we can get to squirrel level AI, we're getting close. From then on, it may just be scaling.