> would you argue that without violent enforcement nobody will stop at red lights? No, I would not. What the hell are you even talking about violence? If you

> would you argue that without violent enforcement nobody will stop at red lights? No, I would not. What the hell are you even talking about violence? If you could argue that you were "ill" "confused" "old", etc. and then they could not use repossession and eviction as an ultimate penalty for collecting taxes owed, then what do you think would happen? EVERYONE would be very soon become "confused" and you would lose the ability to collect property tax. To argue this is immoral is simply basically to argue that taxation itself is immoral.