If I unserstand it right, this is in ducks a defense against contraception, not against coerced sex. Further, if this is supposed to be an argument against leg

If I unserstand it right, this is in ducks a defense against contraception, not against coerced sex. Further, if this is supposed to be an argument against legal abortion (I heard before from the anti-abortion crowd, that the body has defenses against unwanted pregnamcy), then the question becomes if this really can be willfully controlled and if we really want to limit the choice making of women to that short period of time, when they are being violated. I think the disorder comes in, when women complain about it to their doctors, i.e. they are unable to control it. So I don't see a reason why it should be considered anything else in such circumstances.