4 ms·
> It's pretty hard to believe that being able transfer knowledge between digital brains (something that seems arguably inevitable) I don't think it's necessari
by breuleux 5y ago
> It's pretty hard to believe that being able transfer knowledge between digital brains (something that seems arguably inevitable)
I don't think it's necessarily inevitable. It is not a given that future hardware architectures for AI would be inspectable or copiable, because the extra wiring required to do that is space and energy overhead. It may also be the case that greater intelligence comes through better distributed representations and that it simply isn't possible to cheaply translate knowledge from an inferior representation to a superior one (you may need to relearn from scratch). The ability to transfer thoughts may therefore require a sort of lowest-common-denominator representation, in other words, a language. I imagine that language could be more efficient, though.
- eru 5y agoYou are right that it's not inevitable, but still pretty likely. Also keep in mind: Human nerves work (roughly) at the speed of sound. Computers work (roughly) at the speed of light. We already make computers that are much, much faster than humans at sequential processing. About the representation thing: if you start with AIs that are copies from each other, you can probably keep the 'superior' internal representation the same or nearly the same. So I would expect AI clones to be able to exchange knowledge much quicker than unrelated AIs.