I agree. Relying on an external data for interpretation is less impressive. The most impressive would be finding an exact GIF87a file. But, the cheating techniq

I agree. Relying on an external data for interpretation is less impressive. The most impressive would be finding an exact GIF87a file. But, the cheating technique used here isn't a simple task either. I converted the smallest valid GIF file[1] (35 bytes) into decimal number: 540959129019042423917857241427143195931235689921032801204995597056286563376232988672 It's nowhere to be found in PI :) I couldn't even find "GIF87a". So, fuzzy search seems to be a must. [1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2570633/smallest-filesize-for-transparent-single-pixel-image https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2570633/smallest-filesiz...