This feels like an unreasonably nasty and condescending response to an article about how anyone can make mistakes in the moment. I thought it was a pretty good

This feels like an unreasonably nasty and condescending response to an article about how anyone can make mistakes in the moment. I thought it was a pretty good article about how easy it is to sit at your computer and look down at people who fall for scams, but that scams are effective precisely because they take advantage of mistakes and the fallibility of people - even knowledgable ones. I feel like this comment misses the core thesis of the article - that condescension and expectations of human perfection are not effective ways to prevent social engineering attacks and that building systems that anticipate human error is a better approach.