4 ms·
Outside a national system/portal (wherein you can implement all the security you want) it doesn't seem solvable. You need law enforcement and the judiciary to s
by Someone1234 5y ago
Outside a national system/portal (wherein you can implement all the security you want) it doesn't seem solvable. You need law enforcement and the judiciary to sign on though, since actual fake warrants will be their next target.
The prospect if using certificate signed email is an unrealistic tech-nerd dream, the average rural law enforcement personal can barely use Word and has poor or no on-site IT staff. If it is harder to use than Gmail, you may have well forget it.
Could a centralized portal get hacked? Absolutely. But the security spend can be significantly higher, and entirely fictional police departments almost entirely eliminated.
- Spooky23 5y agoIt’s definitely doable. Most states operate portals to facilitate many types of transactions, and it would be easy enough to offer this as a service. This is exactly the way locals use things like codis.
- gpm 5y ago> the average rural law enforcement personal can barely use Word and has poor or no on-site IT staff. Maybe this should be a sign that they have no business requesting sensitive information be transferred to their poorly secured computers? If you let them use insecure computers as endpoints it seems like that there will inevitably continue to be data leaks -- regardless of what sort of security you put on the portal(s) that they use their insecure computers to access. I don't see that a national portal fixes this. Perhaps a national IT-department that controls all the computers involved would work, though I can only imagine what a nightmare setting that up would be.