4 ms·

They just had like 100 APs and well configured roaming. I guess they carefully managed power levels and channels of each AP. It's not much different from 4G mo

They just had like 100 APs and well configured roaming. I guess they carefully managed power levels and channels of each AP. It's not much different from 4G mobile data working well at musical festivals with thousands of visitors. IME from where I live, mobile data work well even when standing in the middle of protests of 10k people (many of them live streaming on FB and Instagram, sending selfies and photos and videos...). 100k becomes a problem though.

worthless-trash 5y ago
I'd love to see this done right, The only company I've seen go close was using ubiquity hardware and they had custom engineering work done to make it work well. I'd -read- the shit out of the book if someone wrote it.
- emteycz 5y ago
  Same here. These corporate network engineers are wizards. When I was a kid, my father had a small WISP. Even that (done with consumer-level hardware) was super interesting. IMHO networking is surprisingly accessible though - it's well documented because the field is built on certifications.
dijit 5y ago
> It's not much different from 4G mobile data working well at musical festivals with thousands of visitors. I promise sincerely that this is the kind of naivity that I was referring to. A single cell site has something like 36 "TRXs" (this is independent of 3/4g), but with 4G due to the fact there is better collision avoidance and a lot of work on the trailing and leading edges inferring meaning: you can have 36 calls without increased latency. You will notice this.
- emteycz 5y ago
  Naivity doesn't matter when you're there and it works. Repeatedly, reliably.
  - PedroBatista 5y ago
    It doesn’t, but it matters when you extrapolate and generalize that Wi-Fi is more than fine for most if not all the people ( even if that wasn’t you intention )

4 ms·

They just had like 100 APs and well configured roaming. I guess they carefully managed power levels and channels of each AP. It's not much different from 4G mo

by emteycz 5y ago

worthless-trash 5y ago
I'd love to see this done right, The only company I've seen go close was using ubiquity hardware and they had custom engineering work done to make it work well. I'd -read- the shit out of the book if someone wrote it.
- emteycz 5y ago
  Same here. These corporate network engineers are wizards. When I was a kid, my father had a small WISP. Even that (done with consumer-level hardware) was super interesting. IMHO networking is surprisingly accessible though - it's well documented because the field is built on certifications.
dijit 5y ago
> It's not much different from 4G mobile data working well at musical festivals with thousands of visitors. I promise sincerely that this is the kind of naivity that I was referring to. A single cell site has something like 36 "TRXs" (this is independent of 3/4g), but with 4G due to the fact there is better collision avoidance and a lot of work on the trailing and leading edges inferring meaning: you can have 36 calls without increased latency. You will notice this.
- emteycz 5y ago
  Naivity doesn't matter when you're there and it works. Repeatedly, reliably.
  - PedroBatista 5y ago
    It doesn’t, but it matters when you extrapolate and generalize that Wi-Fi is more than fine for most if not all the people ( even if that wasn’t you intention )