3 ms·
>The lapse was considered so minor, partly because Secretary of State has final say on classification level anyway This seems a very similar argument to one su
by alasdair_ 5y ago
>The lapse was considered so minor, partly because Secretary of State has final say on classification level anyway
This seems a very similar argument to one suggesting that a supreme court justice can never be charged with a crime.
- lern_too_spel 5y agoIf multiple Supreme Court justices do exactly the same particular thing that you think is a crime, but none of them are prosecuted, it is very likely that you were incorrect in thinking that what they did was a crime. Ignoring a police order to disperse is a crime, but a police chief who directed the officer to make that order can generally ignore that order unless they are acting maliciously.