3 ms·
There are many industrial processes that use tons of power and are far less efficient than a human doing those tasks. Yet, they're still viable because they (sc
by jtuple 5y ago
There are many industrial processes that use tons of power and are far less efficient than a human doing those tasks. Yet, they're still viable because they (scale / are faster / more consistent / etc than humans.
For AGI, it's really about replication, density, and easy-of-operation.
At the moment, we certainly can't mass produce "brains-on-a-chip" that provide a guaranteed level of human-like intelligence across various tasks.
But, imagine a world in which you could install racks of "brains-on-a-chip", powered via electricity (easily distributed/stored/fungible compared to food-powered-brains), and have a Moore's Law like scaling of "brain density". That would change everything, even if those brains consumed 1000W a pop.
Obviously, a literal brain is probably not the way this will pan out (hopefully not! "brains-on-a-chip" is rather creepy...), but you get the idea.
- andrekandre 5y agoif something is generally intelligent, at the level of a human brain, and is forced to work in "industrial processes" isn't that a form of subjugation? there seems to be a moral implication here that alot of people seem to be neglecting...