Humans historically (and today) had to fight for “one person one vote”. People/corporations with access to votes will always outcompete people/corporations with

Humans historically (and today) had to fight for “one person one vote”. People/corporations with access to votes will always outcompete people/corporations without access to votes. This is because voting is a positive feedback loop for those that can, and at best neutral for those that can’t, but typically a negative feedback loop for those that can’t. Similarly, people/corporations with access to AGI will always outcompete people/corporations without AGI. Having AGI is a positive feedback loop to build better / more AGI agents, and not having access to an AGI agent will be at best neutral and typically a negative feedback loop. eg. Worst case scenario Agent Smith from the Matrix replicating itself ad infinitum. We need new and effective laws early, like “one person/body one AGI agent[0]”. Otherwise, not only will we all get outcompeted by a single/few AGI but this time we might not be able to win the fight for “fairness” (i.e. our rights) after Pandora’s box has been opened. [0] Where the definition of AGI agent has explicitly built in assumptions like limited compute, storage, network, and number of “bodies”.