>Did you even try to find this source on your own? This would be impossible to do without knowing what the poster meant by vacant rentals. Some would interpre

>Did you even try to find this source on your own? This would be impossible to do without knowing what the poster meant by vacant rentals. Some would interpret any empty rental unit as vacant, whereas others would interpret it as a rental that is actually available for rent as being vacant. Without a source or other clarification, it can be impossible to know by which definition someone is using. >if not, whose obligation do you think it is to supply a source for empirical claims in a civil discussion? The burden on proof is always on the one making the assertion. > there’s probably a more meaningful way of engaging with the OP than a one word comment: ‘source’ It saves everyone from reading a long sentence when in the end all they are asking is for the person making the assertion to supply proof.