4 ms·
It's a few transparent screens placed near each other. There is no effective Z axis because the pixels aren't anywhere near each other compared to X and Y. Th
by dkjaudyeqooe 5y ago
It's a few transparent screens placed near each other. There is no effective Z axis
because the pixels aren't anywhere near each other compared to X and Y. The "demos" reflect that, showing 2D images. The video is almost entirely fluff.
- andybak 5y agoGee. You're a bundle of fun.
- dkjaudyeqooe 5y agoDid I miss something? Is it not a serious project?
- andybak 5y ago"Serious" is a scalar not a boolean.
- SahAssar 5y agoDo you mean some other definition of scalar than this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalar_processor#Scalar_data_type https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalar_processor#Scalar_data_t... ?
- andybak 5y ago(I was trying to be funny. I just meant "seriousness is not a binary thing" - a project can be both serious and non-serious to varying degrees)
- noasaservice 5y agoIf it's that easy, then show me some prior art. I looked and found nothing of this type. I think it's rather ingenious.
- toast0 5y agohttps://www.hackster.io/news/creating-a-3d-volumetric-display-with-a-stack-of-transparent-oled-screens-2d6360904431 https://www.hackster.io/news/creating-a-3d-volumetric-displa... This is from 3 years ago. First link in ddg for 'stacked transparent displays' Also, here's a paper from 1999 about stacking three transparent displays to get RGB, maybe. Not exactly the same, but prior art for sure. https://works.bepress.com/peifang_tian/3/ https://works.bepress.com/peifang_tian/3/
- bee_rider 5y agoThe video shows some similar-but-better products, they are just unreasonably expensive.
- bsedlm 5y agoit's still massively cool, also, it's just a first prototype. as these things usually go, they're gonna be squishing these closer and closer together