"Think about it carefully - if people rate people as being good at communication, then there is no reason to quantify it any other way. There are some obvious f

"Think about it carefully - if people rate people as being good at communication, then there is no reason to quantify it any other way. There are some obvious flaws here, like the quantity of data and it's normalization, but it's basically a tautology." So if a lot of people rate you as a great leader, you are a great leader? Even if you lie to their face and delover terrible results? Objective reality doesn't matter? So the greatest leader in the world is in North Korea? Communication is a clearly measurable skill. Just because a lot of people have been sold a lie, that doesn't make it true