3 ms·
I have a feeling you may not be able to talk about this, and thats okay. That said, I'm asking anyway. Did you consider working with CloudFlare? I feel like Su
by no_wizard 5y ago
I have a feeling you may not be able to talk about this, and thats okay. That said, I'm asking anyway.
Did you consider working with CloudFlare? I feel like Supabase is the perfect fill for the "holes" that CloudFlare has in their services, that you guys fill. They don't have two crucial things currently: Persistent Data Store that's accessible outside of its platform, and an Authentication product. They otherwise have everything else and more. Seems like it would have been a very mutual relationship.
Any insights on this one by chance?
I'm loving Supabase, and the only gateway to adoption on my side is the lack of SOC 2 compliance, which I understand is coming. However I don't want to give up best in class services for things like CDN, Storage, Workers etc. I'm kind of an "all in" platform person. I don't want variance in vendors, I want one vendor with variance, if that makes sense.
Don't per se mean I wouldn't use Supabase still, of course! I love the product where I have been able to test it out, and once SOC 2 compliance lands that will clear the final adoption hurdle for me anyway
- kiwicopple 5y agowe're working closely with Cloudflare and really love their products. We did consider Cloudflare Workers - ultimately it came down to the open source philosophy of the Deno runtime. It's incredibly important to us that everything in Supabase has "escape hatches" - you can choose to host wherever you want to. I'm certain that Workers will get there eventually, but it's not there yet. We're still big fans and will be doing other neat things with them in the future (also we'll revisit Workers if the runtime becomes an open source). > lack of SOC 2 compliance We've chosen the auditor - I believe SOC2 Type I will be around 4 months away (next Launch Week)
- ghotli 5y agoFrom one audit-passer to another, godspeed
- nextaccountic 5y ago> It's incredibly important to us that everything in Supabase has "escape hatches" - you can choose to host wherever you want to I'm rooting for you guys, not only your tech stack is very solid, but commitment to letting your users self-host if they want to is laudable. But here's something I don't understand about your offering. Taking a look at the pricing page https://supabase.com/pricing https://supabase.com/pricing there is only one pricing tier above free but below the scary-looking "contact us for a quote". The idea is that you get a reasonable baseline included and pay for extra storage and bandwidth. Cool. But it comes with a number of fixed limits that I find puzzling, like 100k monthly active users. On edge functions, they can run 1000 hours (per month?), invoked 2 million times, and there's a limit of 100 functions in total. The customer can't pay a little more to have the limits raised a little further like they could with storage and bandwidth, they need to migrate to the enterprise plan. So I must ask: why is that? I almost don't care because I'm the kind of person that likes to run their own servers but, I want to support you guys.
- kiwicopple 5y agoLooks like we accidentally blitz the "Pay as you Go" pricing on that page after adding the Enterprise tier on Wednesday. Sorry about that Everything in the "Pro tier" has a "usage cost" and you pay only for what you use above the $25 (or you can add a $25 spend cap to avoid an unexpected bill - https://supabase.com/blog/2022/03/30/supabase-enterprise#spend-caps https://supabase.com/blog/2022/03/30/supabase-enterprise#spe...) I'll get the team revert the change today so that the Usage pricing is listed
- wdb 5y agoSame I can't use it because of lack of ISO 27001 certification