I agree but that's a sign we need more peer review. IMO it's unethical to engage in fake peer review like that. I recently encountered the opposite - a reviewer

I agree but that's a sign we need more peer review. IMO it's unethical to engage in fake peer review like that. I recently encountered the opposite - a reviewer that wrote a fake negative review of my paper without reading it. Killed the paper at a good journal by making claims that are easily verified to be false.