4 ms·
While there may not be any reliable measure of communication skills across the industry, the fact that the data was based on scores given my a large amount of p
by rocgf 5y ago
While there may not be any reliable measure of communication skills across the industry, the fact that the data was based on scores given my a large amount of people, that by definition means that it's accurate.
Think about it carefully - if people rate people as being good at communication, then there is no reason to quantify it any other way. There are some obvious flaws here, like the quantity of data and it's normalization, but it's basically a tautology.
- ClumsyPilot 5y ago"Think about it carefully - if people rate people as being good at communication, then there is no reason to quantify it any other way. There are some obvious flaws here, like the quantity of data and it's normalization, but it's basically a tautology." So if a lot of people rate you as a great leader, you are a great leader? Even if you lie to their face and delover terrible results? Objective reality doesn't matter? So the greatest leader in the world is in North Korea? Communication is a clearly measurable skill. Just because a lot of people have been sold a lie, that doesn't make it true