3 ms·

correct, it has an overlapping feature set of currencies and most other asset classes simultaneously

mirntyfirty 5y ago
That is also meaningless. I have an overlapping feature set with Jeff Bezos in that I’m alive and have eyebrows. This doesn’t mean that there are meaningful financial comparisons. What is your crypto position and why have you taken that position?
- vmception 5y ago
  >That is also meaningless. I have an overlapping feature set with Jeff Bezos in that I’m alive and have eyebrows. This doesn’t mean that there are meaningful financial comparisons. oh I didn't realize you were trying to reinforce a perspective on that, in this case there also are an overlapping set of financial comparisons as well, that are inherently tied to the overlapping feature sets the only lacking thing is that a government isn't the one pushing for demand of the intermediary asset that is used to purchase other assets, and the people that are typically do not have an ability to control supply and demand or have a debt market to distort with a central bank (quoting the above because I was responding before your edit) > What is your crypto position and why have you taken that position? and for after your edit, you might be in the wrong decade for your perspective, in my world what you're asking is like trying to prove I can't be a good source about US equities (or perhaps, currencies) based on whether I owned a stock (or a dollar) at some time in time and don't really debate about their mere existence - as opposed to acknowledging their existence and availability and would maybe debate about a specific one if compelled
  - deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]
- vmception 5y ago
  saw your flagged response, from your source it is defined as: "The Gish gallop is a rhetorical technique in which a person in a debate attempts to overwhelm their opponent by providing an excessive number of arguments with no regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments." since I was responding in good faith and wasn't making any argument as opposed to a valid reality that's easy to experience, is this is a cognitive limitation for you to feel as if you have been overwhelmed by excessive number of arguments? because that would say more about you and your ability to have this conversation at all, like maybe your worldview is incapable of being more plastic

That is also meaningless. I have an overlapping feature set with Jeff Bezos in that I’m alive and have eyebrows. This doesn’t mean that there are meaningful financial comparisons. What is your crypto position and why have you taken that position?

vmception 5y ago
>That is also meaningless. I have an overlapping feature set with Jeff Bezos in that I’m alive and have eyebrows. This doesn’t mean that there are meaningful financial comparisons. oh I didn't realize you were trying to reinforce a perspective on that, in this case there also are an overlapping set of financial comparisons as well, that are inherently tied to the overlapping feature sets the only lacking thing is that a government isn't the one pushing for demand of the intermediary asset that is used to purchase other assets, and the people that are typically do not have an ability to control supply and demand or have a debt market to distort with a central bank (quoting the above because I was responding before your edit) > What is your crypto position and why have you taken that position? and for after your edit, you might be in the wrong decade for your perspective, in my world what you're asking is like trying to prove I can't be a good source about US equities (or perhaps, currencies) based on whether I owned a stock (or a dollar) at some time in time and don't really debate about their mere existence - as opposed to acknowledging their existence and availability and would maybe debate about a specific one if compelled
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
vmception 5y ago
saw your flagged response, from your source it is defined as: "The Gish gallop is a rhetorical technique in which a person in a debate attempts to overwhelm their opponent by providing an excessive number of arguments with no regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments." since I was responding in good faith and wasn't making any argument as opposed to a valid reality that's easy to experience, is this is a cognitive limitation for you to feel as if you have been overwhelmed by excessive number of arguments? because that would say more about you and your ability to have this conversation at all, like maybe your worldview is incapable of being more plastic