4 ms·
The fallacy to these findings and conclusions is that you're measuring processes of your own brand and flavor; the biases are so deep you likely don't recognize
by robbywashere_ 5y ago
The fallacy to these findings and conclusions is that you're measuring processes of your own brand and flavor; the biases are so deep you likely don't recognize them. 'technical', 'problem solving', 'communication' these are all of your own construction, setting, presentation and scoring. Look at the failings of the IQ test for example.
I'm curious if people just really need to learn the talk and the walk of a silicon valley employee to land a job at a FAANG.
- pas 5y ago> Look at the failings of the IQ test for example. can you elaborate on that please?
- stale2002 5y ago> The fallacy to these findings and conclusions is that you're measuring processes of your own brand and flavor > Look at the failings of the IQ test for example. You are mis-interpreting the point of all of this. This website does practice interviews. It doesn't measure how good of an engineer someone is, or how smart they are, and they don't claim to do so. Instead, it measures how good they are at tech interviews. And for that purpose, the study works well enough.