Well, the article gets quite tricky with the Supreme Court decision that let McConnell off the hook. It does look like he did not commit the overt corrupt act a

Well, the article gets quite tricky with the Supreme Court decision that let McConnell off the hook. It does look like he did not commit the overt corrupt act at the definition of the statute, and the judge instructed the jury badly. The article claims this is complicity in the Supreme Court, but I’m not so sure. Cases of corruption since that verdict have been interesting: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4829&context=ndlr https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4...