I am not familiar with the set theory field, or whatever it's called more exactly. The language in the article, from a layman point, is vague, and I think also

I am not familiar with the set theory field, or whatever it's called more exactly. The language in the article, from a layman point, is vague, and I think also uses many words that have somewhat a different meaning to their mainstream one that it makes it pretty much impossible to read for me. Maybe this is where a science journalist could do a good job! I'm thinking Vi Hart for example.