3 ms·
OK, these were interesting. Are we ready to share thoughts on them? For 1.2.10, I got a single equation involving the three unknowns--does that sound right?
by lepton 15y ago
OK, these were interesting. Are we ready to share thoughts on them?
For 1.2.10, I got a single equation involving the three unknowns--does that sound right?
- gruseom 15y agoLet's talk in detail about 1.2 and hold off on 1.3 until tptacek confirms. Re 1.2.10, I think that's right. Because the x-coords grow by the same amount as you go from one point to the next, the y-coords must as well, giving y3-y2 = y2-y1.
- mechanical_fish 15y agoYes, this is correct. (Though I haven't looked to see which problem this is, I can pretty much tell it's that one.) If we're not through 1.3 yet I'm not far behind! Will try to plug away on my 1.2 problems in between bugfixes.
- gruseom 15y agoI'm glad to hear that. I've been hoping that a group pace would emerge. If it's slower than we planned, that's ok as long as it still overcomes friction.
- lepton 15y agoGood. That's a really geometric understanding, which is helpful. I saw it as somewhat analogous to the back-substitution after lower-triangulation; using y=mx + b and starting with y_0 = b, then y_1 = m + y_0.