3 ms·
Autonomous trucks don't need stationary rest so you can halve your fleet number just from higher fleet utilization. Battery powered trucks are also expected to
by otherotherchris 5y ago
Autonomous trucks don't need stationary rest so you can halve your fleet number just from higher fleet utilization.
Battery powered trucks are also expected to have lower downtime for maintenance and overhaul, so you can shave off another 5%. Rebuilding an engine and gearbox is an expensive maintenance activity that is completely eliminated, along with brake servicing due to regenerative braking.
Once the charger situation is figured out, probably an overhead catenary and dedicated charging lanes to keep the trucks in motion while charging, the savings will be compelling.
- Retric 5y agoCharging trucks is a more frequent and time consuming process than refueling them, which probably more than offsets these savings.
- iancmceachern 5y agoMany long distance truckers operate in teams and stagger their driving hours, so i think this will not be such a factor. It's not true that brake services are eliminated, these trucks will still need conventional brakes. Yes there are some servicing savings, but these trucks have already been refined to be very reliable and have long periods of time between maintenance activities. The time savings due to less maintenance will be in the noise, maybe a few percent. The cost savings will be more, less fluids, etc. The big factor here is the labor savings, all other efficiencies are there, but insignificant in comparison and will not be the driving factors for adoption - the labor savings will.