3 ms·
It would be smart for me to neither confirm nor deny but I will say no. The way I see it the government has its own concerns and they may not align with mine.
by regpertom 5y ago
It would be smart for me to neither confirm nor deny but I will say no.
The way I see it the government has its own concerns and they may not align with mine. Can’t necessarily be angry that they’d want to maximise helped people. Not telling us and locking the doors though not so good. The other side of that is events like US disaster Katrina where there is too many people and too much paperwork that people become helpless wards of the state. That’s what makes a disaster a disaster, a failure of normal expectations? How would an individual even begin to feed 100000 people you know? There’s a certain helpless at scale.
The army did eventually show up, “the government” eventually got the power and phones up again etc. the sun did eventually appear again.
A skilled individual can produce excess, that excess can be shared with others, zooming out, family then community then state then country. But as we zoom out we have to rely on abstractions and quantisations. At the level I’m talking about though it was possible to say “if you’re on this map your one of us, the rest doesn’t matter” we could then ignore the rest. Much like the government ignored us?
What I’m trying to get across is a certain inspiration from being abandoned by government, big one or little one, show a little passion and violently execute an average plan!
Marcus Aurelius says something about being self reliant so that you can help society, not so that you can show off but so that you’re not a burden but that’s beyond my pay grade.
Somebody said that it couldn’t be done so with a smile on his face he got to it.