>Risk adjusted scoring is entirely viable in this age of data science It's just not unviable, I don't think it's even possible. As soon as a metric becomes tr

>Risk adjusted scoring is entirely viable in this age of data science It's just not unviable, I don't think it's even possible. As soon as a metric becomes tracked, people are incentivized to game it. From my own experience as a very high-volume eBay seller, mandating a certain return rate led us to simply discourage customers from using the (convenient, well-designed) integrated returns systems. Mandating that only a tiny fraction of a percentage of items can be cancelled due to being out of stock leads to sellers sending either the wrong item or a fake tracking number (this gets us all the time on AliExpress). If data-driven software companies can't handle it for something as simple as eCommerce, I have no idea how the medical industry is supposed to get it right.