3 ms·
I'm electric engineer for first education, and length of wave is very dependent from environment electromagnetic properties. And ideal antenna is dipole (two s
by simne 5y ago
I'm electric engineer for first education, and length of wave is very dependent from environment electromagnetic properties.
And ideal antenna is dipole (two sticks) of quarter wave length.
In short, vacuum have coefficients 1 for electric and for magnetic properties (Earth atmosphere is very close to vacuum) and in medium with higher coefficient (all other mediums have coef 1 or more), speed of light is smaller and wave length is also smaller.
Most known for e-m props are glass, water and glycerine (or just commodity oils), I at the moment lazy to look for glass properties (they vary), but for glycerine, electrostatic 80 times more than vacuum, so antenna will be 80 times smaller.
And after Second World War found (invented) new materials, which have e-m coef-s of 1000-10000 and even more, so could make much smaller antennas than for free air.
Also exists lot of variants of spiral antennas, which are less effective than ideal dipoles, but good enough for practical purposes.
In most radical forms, used some sort of spiral coated with material with very high e-m coefficient, so antenna could be very small.
- mlyle 5y agoThe number one reason that an inefficient, small antenna works well for AM radio is that even with an awful antenna, AM radio performance isn't limited by receiver sensitivity. Atmospheric noise and nearby EMI will dominate over any receiver noise.
- simne 5y agoIn reality, it depends on channel width. Exists UWB radios with 10th MegaGertz channels and even more (from zero), and they have extremely good performance even with relatively low transmit power.