4 ms·
I may have misinterpreted the explanation given in the post. It sounded to me like a developer they'd employed violated the TOS on their personal Google dev acc
by nerdawson 5y ago
I may have misinterpreted the explanation given in the post. It sounded to me like a developer they'd employed violated the TOS on their personal Google dev account. Google then recognised a connection between the dev and another Google account belonging to a company and opted to suspend that as well.
To use your example, that would be like an employee getting their bank account frozen for something they'd done in their personal life, and then the company having their bank frozen too for depositing money into the employee's account.
- anaccountexists 5y agoI’d liken the latter to having a company credit card account. Regardless, in the bank case there’s a high chance adjacent / connected accounts would be frozen (at least for a time) because money laundering tends to happen in rings. I see your point, though.
- Semaphor 5y ago> I’d liken the latter to having a company credit card account. No, having had a company credit card account 3 years ago. Unless I’m misunderstanding something, the employee had no more relationship to the company for some time.