3 ms·
So, going with the Mexican dog analogy: the pain of working from the office is still less than the other scenario. If I had two offers, and one was 20% less co
by xtracto 5y ago
So, going with the Mexican dog analogy: the pain of working from the office is still less than the other scenario.
If I had two offers, and one was 20% less compensation plus WFH and the other +20% but working from office ONCE a day, I'd go for the WFH one.
Of course everybody's factors are different.
- Cthulhu_ 5y ago> Of course everybody's factors are different. I'm glad you acknowledge it; with rising cost of living, housing prices, and (in my case) medical expenses (the part not covered by insurance, like physical therapy; we're still trying to get a diagnosis so it will be covered), I can't afford a 20% pay cut. Even pre-pandemic, I rejected an offer from a company literally across the street from where I live, because their offer was >30% lower than what I was earning at the time. I just flat out told them I wouldn't be able to afford to live there - and I live in some of the cheapest houses in this area.