Thank you! With questions it generally does pretty well with factually oriented or specific questions, but it will try with subjective topics to provide a summa

Thank you! With questions it generally does pretty well with factually oriented or specific questions, but it will try with subjective topics to provide a summary of the "hive mind consensus" or zeitgeist of the top results. When the questions are more complex, adding more detail and specifics can help too. Thanks for the kind words about the way the results are presented too. It is a big change from a page of links, but we've had a great response to the different views of results, and we really appreciate your encouragement about the formatting :)