2 ms·
Having done a bit more reading, I’m increasingly convinced QV has very narrow application rather than being a general voting scheme, and may simply be a vacuous
by iainmerrick 5y ago
Having done a bit more reading, I’m increasingly convinced QV has very narrow application rather than being a general voting scheme, and may simply be a vacuous idea. I guess I need to dig into the proof to see what is actually claimed (versus loosely extrapolated).
The use of QV in voting scenarios where you have 100 tokens to split among alternatives seems completely motiveless, beyond “QV is great because there’s a mathematical proof.” But a proof of what? Not a proof of anything relating to that voting scheme, as far as I can see.