5 ms·
Yeah probably, but that doesn't explain why Intel's higher-end coolers do have a cowl. Surely the higher-end chips need VRM cooling way more than budget-mode i5
by pubby 5y ago
Yeah probably, but that doesn't explain why Intel's higher-end coolers do have a cowl. Surely the higher-end chips need VRM cooling way more than budget-mode i5s, especially when run at stock power limits.
FWIW, when I tested (I'm the author), I didn't see any VRM throttling, even on my dinky budget motherboard. But then again, my power limits are set to Intel's recommended values and I'm not overclocking or anything.
- kenhwang 5y agoCommon belief in the computer cooling world is higher end VRMs need _less_ cooling because they're more efficient (which generates less heat) and have higher temperature tolerances.
- 7speter 5y agoIntel doesn’t even sell their higher end chips with their stock cooler iirc, and people put heatsink coolers where the active cooling is parallel to the chip as opposed to directly on top of (if not liquid coolers) on the higher end/overclockable chips. Also it seems that generally the z class boards have higher quality vrms and significant passive cooling on top of their vrms, i could definitely be wrong though.
- k_sze 5y agoDid your paper cowl make a difference to the fan speed?
- nyanpasu64 5y agoListening to the two recordings, the one with the cowl has a very slightly higher fan speed (by less than 6%). I don't know if it cools the CPU better or worse at a given speed though.
- pubby 5y agoThe BIOS screen says the CPU fan runs at the same speed regardless of the cowl, but I'm not sure if this is accurately measuring RPM, or just estimating it from some other variable (e.g. the outgoing pulse-width modulation signal).
- NavinF 5y agoIf it’s a 3/4 pin fan and the motherboard is configured to treat it as such, then you’re looking at the real RPM. It’s easy to test by placing your finger on the center of the fan and watching the RPM go down.