4 ms·

ITunes store now compatible with the GPL?

7 points by spot 15y ago

http://www.apple.com/legal/itunes/us/terms.html says: You may not copy (except as expressly permitted by this license and the Usage Rules), decompile, reverse-engineer, disassemble, attempt to derive the source code of, modify, or create derivative works of the Licensed Application, any updates, or any part thereof (except as and only to the extent that any foregoing restriction is prohibited by applicable law or to the extent as may be permitted by the licensing terms governing use of any open-sourced components included with the Licensed Application). When did that change? Does that mean I could include a GPL executable as part of my app?

wmf 15y ago
I think some people are still complaining that the App Store does not provide app source code on request.
- gte910h 15y ago
  No, they're complaining about the copy protection on the binaries both legal and technical
  - spot 15y ago
    the above clause says the copy protection does not apply to the open source portions, so what's the problem?
    - gte910h 15y ago
      That doesn't fix the technical part. You can't copy apps from one phone to another, etc, which is a prime issue with the GPL.
      - spot 15y ago
        But in the mac app store (which is also delivered by itunes) you could.
        gte910h 15y ago
        no, it's delivered by the Mac Appstore app.
spot 15y ago
where's the amendment to this post: http://www.fsf.org/news/blogs/licensing/more-about-the-app-store-gpl-enforcement http://www.fsf.org/news/blogs/licensing/more-about-the-app-s... ?
RussNelson 15y ago
The problem is that Apple's terms add restrictions, which the GPL prohibits. If the author had uploaded the code, Apple's defense could be "Well, they agreed to the terms, so their item is licensed under the combination of our terms plus the GPL's terms, even though the GPL claims that it can't be modified." Unfortunately, that doesn't work AT ALL if the work includes GPLed code from a third party. The solution is to create an "Itunes Open Source License" which says "The terms of the GPL are superior to the Itunes license when they do not conflict, but the Itunes license is superior if they do." Or, alternatively, kick Apple's butt until they stop trying to restrict freedoms granted by the GPL. At that point, the usage terms will be compatible with the GPL.