The more I think about it, I'm not even comfortable calling this collusion. Vote-buying is bad (some people disagree!) because we don't want people selling the

The more I think about it, I'm not even comfortable calling this collusion. Vote-buying is bad (some people disagree!) because we don't want people selling the decision, we want them to make it themselves. But a conversation like "I was thinking four points on A but I see why you're all in on B now, tell you what how about we go two for two on it" strikes me as a good outcome in a voting system. The fact that linear voting doesn't have an equivalent of it doesn't imply we should consider this 'collusion' rather than 'cooperation'.