2 ms·
That's fine. Just know that he's effectively a quack.
by colinmhayes 5y ago
That's fine. Just know that he's effectively a quack.
- soVeryTired 5y agoIt'd be nice to see a refutation of his arguments, or at least a recognition of them. As it stands I've just seen two ad hominems in a row and not much else.
- LudwigNagasena 5y agohttps://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/43116/did-william-nordhaus-exclude-87-of-economic-industries-from-his-climate-change https://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/43116/did-will... https://economics.stackexchange.com/a/18992/1601 https://economics.stackexchange.com/a/18992/1601