3 ms·
I don't know. reirob's and fab13n's code are more general as they do not require that some type of ordering is placeable on its set of inputs. Your code requir
by Dn_Ab 15y ago
I don't know. reirob's and fab13n's code are more general as they do not require that some type of ordering is placeable on its set of inputs.
Your code requires that the elements are comparable. So your effectively is predicated on whether you think that limitation is not a big deal (technically it greatly restricts the type of elements, practically maybe not?)
- ColinWright 15y agoAll true, but only serving to obscure my question about why this is not considered functional by the OP. My first thought was to go with running down the list of indices, as fab13n does, but I thought I'd go for the less generic but cleaner code to try to get to the real point. I guess I failed.