Debian is apparently bad at democracy despite putting a lot of thought into the matter. The entire problem has to do with conflating 3 questions with boolean an

Debian is apparently bad at democracy despite putting a lot of thought into the matter. The entire problem has to do with conflating 3 questions with boolean answers as 3 sets of answers to those 3 questions. 1. Should we have a vote to amend yes no higher threshold to pass. 2. If yes should we hide identities of developers casting a vote yes no 3. If yes should we allow verification yes no Arguably 3 is a ridiculous question so ought to be safely omitted. Arguably it would be reasonable to require more than 10% to cast a vote as well. All we know now is that a single digit percentage of Debian developers prefer to vote anon. Given the low turnout there is little reason not to respect the present result but have another smarter vote.