4 ms·
or enough people or someone "influential" start to complain on social media and it gets enough traction.
by gordon_freeman 5y ago
or enough people or someone "influential" start to complain on social media and it gets enough traction.
- encryptluks2 5y ago
- cryo78 5y agoWhy do you believe that everything the government does is nefarious? If you really believe your government is after you and everyone else you can try to change it or leave the country. The one option that doesn’t change anything is posting unrelated comments on the web. How is the government informing people bad? Are schools bad? Universities?
- encryptluks2 5y ago
- nkozyra 5y ago> So you'd be okay if on Jan 6, Donald Trump used the emergency broadcast system The article you linked doesn't seem to say anything about using EBS. Trump used every platform available to spread the notion that the election was rigged, so I'm not following the whatabout here.
- encryptluks2 5y agoAs far as I'm aware it only came from his personal accounts.
- nkozyra 5y agoI don't think I said otherwise. Seems a pedantic distinction, though.
- ecf 5y ago
- cryo78 5y ago
- boredumb 5y ago
- cryo78 5y ago
- revscat 5y agoI echo the sibling comment on asking for an explanation as to why you feel that this is a bad thing. Are you American? If so, would you rather the government not make their case to influencers?
- encryptluks2 5y agoYes I would rather the government not use social media influencers to try to change public opinion on matters. They shouldn't be performing PsyOps on their own citizens.
- revscat 5y agoExcept that what they were doing is better described as outreach, and was done openly and in apparent good faith. Such outreach is especially important given the prevalence of FSB psyops — actual psyops — throughout the world.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- Razengan 5y ago> The White House is “briefing” TikTok stars about [what to say about] the war in Ukraine If that’s not propaganda, what is?