3 ms·

I'm not too sure what the difference between that and the signature requirement is. > (i) A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on b

I'm not too sure what the difference between that and the signature requirement is. > (i) A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

q-big 5y ago
I only have shallow knowledge of the US law, but in German law, if you give the analogue of an affidavit (eidesstattliche Versicherung) instead of just a signed statement, you will face harsh legal consequences if the statement in it turns out to be false.
- Mindwipe 5y ago
  It's a perjury offense in the US under the existing DCMA. You basically suggested the current practice.
  - q-big 5y ago
    But then I am surprised that considering the many false DCMA claims, there are so few perjury lawsuits against the responsible persons.