4 ms·
This is poorly written; words and punctuation are missing all over the place. I don’t understand the git analogy at all. > If we’re extending the definition o
by cmckn 5y ago
This is poorly written; words and punctuation are missing all over the place.
I don’t understand the git analogy at all.
> If we’re extending the definition of web3 to include decentralized software systems
We certainly aren’t. Web3 is defined by “trustless” decentralized systems (which usually aren’t actually decentralized, in practice).
Branding a database as “Web3” is terrible PR, given web3’s reputation for obscene inefficiency and high latency. The marketing team should reconsider this post.
- spicybright 5y agoI still don't really get what web3 actually means. It seems like the new "cloud" when describing software.
- ModernMech 5y agoAs far as I can tell, it answers the question "What if corporations re-invented the Internet in their own image?"
- golgappi 5y agoIt's basically a decentralized, censorship-resistant P2P internet. The philosophy has merit, but the performance sucks and it is currently mostly a venture capitalist funded scam.