3 ms·

Is this a sustainability argument?

• oblio 5y ago
  Well, yes. More people bunched up together use less CO2 for doing stuff and can pool expenses better. The fact that we've pulled people out of agriculture and we can grow food for 100 with just 1-2 actually growing it is great for the planet, for the economy, for human development.
  • teakettle42 5y ago
    You cannot satisfy your most fundamental need for food and water. “Ruralia” is already entirely ecologically sustainable. If you don’t want to subsidize rural infrastructure through your tax dollars, then frankly, we should just charge you exorbitant rates for our food and water, and then — by your metric — we’ll be entirely financially sustainable, too.
    • brimble 5y ago
      > “Ruralia” is already entirely ecologically sustainable. If you live largely "off the grid", grow much of your own food, don't go out much (since any going out means a lot of driving, if you're in the country), and rarely order goods delivery... sure.
      • collegeburner 5y ago
        I have some buddies who now make their own biodiesel. That makes the driving carbon neutral. I hope to do the same in the next few years, once I get my next vehicle (probably a diesel).