3 ms·
The leak is already widely available publicly. It's OSINT now, public domain. Pretending like it doesn't exist is going to do customers a lot more harm than goo
by px43 5y ago
The leak is already widely available publicly. It's OSINT now, public domain. Pretending like it doesn't exist is going to do customers a lot more harm than good, so doing your part to make sure that people know that these materials are public is 100% in the interest of the public, and Zoom's customers.
- lelanthran 5y ago> The leak is already widely available publicly. It's OSINT now, public domain. Pretending like it doesn't exist is going to do customers a lot more harm than good, so doing your part to make sure that people know that these materials are public is 100% in the interest of the public, and Zoom's customers. Yeah, but what an employee thinks is good for the customer is irrelevant. What the company thinks is good for the customer is the relevant question. If the employee thinks that republishing publicly available leaks is good for the customer, they should get permission from the company before publishing it. It's not the employee's call, even if it is in the customer's interest. Whistle-blowing is a totally different thing; this wasn't that.