4 ms·
> I really don’t care for Chrome users and their inability to do pure TLSv1.3. You "don't really care" for a majority of users, based on what? TLS 1.2 is perfe
by lazyweb 5y ago
> I really don’t care for Chrome users and their inability to do pure TLSv1.3.
You "don't really care" for a majority of users, based on what? TLS 1.2 is perfectly fine to use with strong ciphers.
I salute your static website which is free of JS/cookies/bloat/external stuff (similar to my own blog), but at the same time you're actively sabotaging accessibility.
- egberts1 5y agoNot concerned with accessibility as opppsed to security. If they are astute in cybersecurity, they will be using other (and secured) browsers.
- oynqr 5y agoWhat is your threat model here? Also, I use Vanadium with JS disabled, which is already decently hardened imho. Yet, your choice of key exchange bars me from your site.
- egberts1 5y agoMeanwhile, https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/03/googles-topics-advertising-system-starts-rolling-out-to-chrome-canary/ https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/03/googles-topics-adver...
- oynqr 5y agoThank god I don't use Chrome then.
- egberts1 5y agoChoose a better set of keys.
- egberts1 5y agoOf course, it’s Chromium-based which in turn is Chrome-based, or something.