3 ms·
It's not about splitting the vote in that way; Debian's system is robust to that. It's about the 3:1 supermajority requirement that was needed for Option 1 and
by mjw1007 5y ago
It's not about splitting the vote in that way; Debian's system is robust to that.
It's about the 3:1 supermajority requirement that was needed for Option 1 and Option 2.
It turns out that their rules for dealing with this work by comparing those options against NOTA only; the problem is that it's plausible that many of the voters didn't realise this.
- naniwaduni 5y ago> It turns out that their rules for dealing with this work by comparing those options against NOTA only; the problem is that it's plausible that many of the voters didn't realise this. Yet Another case for approval voting over like, all other voting systems.
- ClayShentrup 5y agoit's the simplified case of score voting, which is even even more accurate with a scale like 0-5. albeit at the cost of simplicity.
- rstuart4133 5y ago>It turns out that their rules for dealing with this work by comparing those options against NOTA only; the problem is that it's plausible that many of the voters didn't realise this. And that the super majority was achieved by 1 vote. So in some sense it was a cliff hanger. But 3 to 1 is a large margin, which likely has a bit of fat. I'm not uncomfortable with it.