3 ms·
I agree, Zoom seemed willing to work with the ex-employee. Unfortunately people often overlook that they are an ambassador for the company they work for. Their
by davidg109 5y ago
I agree, Zoom seemed willing to work with the ex-employee.
Unfortunately people often overlook that they are an ambassador for the company they work for. Their employer will usually not tolerate aggravating a (potential) revenue-generating relationship with a third party by any employee.
I believe Zoom did the right thing here, but I’m curious what CA law says.
- SuperGent 5y agoI believe that California is an 'at-will' state so it might not make any difference, but I'm not a lawyer.