10 ms·

Review: The 2011 $79 Kindle with ads and buttons

87 points by revorad 15y ago

bryanlarsen 15y ago
"but you’ll regret purchasing an alternative the first time a book isn’t available there but is available for Kindle, which happens a lot." This has never happened to me. Everything I've encountered that's not available on Kobo is also not available on Kindle. Is this because I don't live in the US?
- RexRollman 15y ago
  Probably. Sadly, the book, music, and movies industries don't seem to be keeping up with the changes globalization have brought.
  - TheAmazingIdiot 15y ago
    Not true. Globalization works well for the media (books, music, movie) industry. They can stratify and adjust rates to the destination country. Doing so, they can maximise profits for each area. Doing so also requires that users do not share amongst other areas, so 'zone controls' along with ill-suited laws are passed. Who globalisation does not work well for when concerning media is the rest of us. With exception of piracy, we are prevented from easily using globalisation in our advantage. Piracy is the great equaliser. It alone has scared media companies from releasing on a 2-3 year theater-to-public to as little as 1 month turnaround. And it is the ideal method to use to play your media format on any system (unlike restricted legit formats).
- avolcano 15y ago
  The big draw for me with the Kindle that doesn't seem to be available on its competitors is wireless document delivery - I used this with Instapaper, and now with Readability. Thanks to it, I never need to worry about plugging my Kindle into my PC to add articles I want to read. There's also some interesting content in the curated "Kindle Singles" section, cheap short stories, novellas, etc.
  - achompas 15y ago
    Did you switch from Instapaper to Readability? If so, why? Did you want to support authors directly?
    - avolcano 15y ago
      Honestly, I switched because I liked the interface and the mobile web app more than I liked Instapaper's site and app. Readability's "readable view" is soooo much nicer than Instapaper's. Supporting authors is a nice bonus, though.
- aidenn0 15y ago
  This isn't a problem for me since there is a Calibre plugin that converts azw to epub. I just buy from wherever is cheapest, unless a DRM-free version is available for a few dollars more (Just because I can strip the DRM doesn't mean I don't want to vote with my dollars).
ChrisLTD 15y ago
Sad to see that the two most important buttons on the device haven't been improved. I'm glad I still have a working Kindle 2!
- adestefan 15y ago
  I think this is one of those times where what you've used first is what you like best. My first Kindle was a version 3 and thought the buttons were weird when I handled a relative's version 2 last Christmas.
  - ChrisLTD 15y ago
    Good point!
achompas 15y ago
The lock screen shows a giant ad whenever the Kindle is off. Previous Kindles show tasteful pictures of classic authors when they’re off. This comment says more about how Marco sees technology than anything else. I can understand complaints about the page buttons, the cheap cable, and no power adapter. But tasteful pictures of classic authors? You're telling me that a creepy-looking picture of Emily Dickinson is a large improvement over an AT&T ad? Look at these screen savers and tell me any of them is worth paying an extra $50: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LasvphqtfV0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LasvphqtfV0 I agree with the sentiment: ads can be disgusting. I just don't understand how someone could complain when ads mean savings get passed on. Ads make the Kindle more affordable and take us a step closer to a future where everyone can afford technology. That's a trade-off I'm willing to make.
- asolove 15y ago
  I think the real question is: why is putting ads on our reading devices worth $50 to advertisers? We can be proud and say that such ads have no effect on our behavior, but statistics say otherwise. Certainly I see a lifestyle difference between friends who watch TV and those who don't, and I spend and desire much less now that I only occasionally watch movies on Netflix. So it's a Catch-22: you can save money on this purchase, but only by ultimately spending more on things you will later be convinced that you need.
  - achompas 15y ago
    Agreed. No TV means no restaurant commercials, so I've been eating at home more often. On the other hand, I bought a reading light after seeing a Kindle ad for it. The Kindle has also saved $15 on Amazon purchases I would've made anyway, though. I dunno, it really depends on your taste for consumption.
  - esrauch 15y ago
    > why is putting ads on our reading devices worth $50 to advertisers? We can be proud and say that such ads have no effect on our behavior, but statistics say otherwise. This does not actually have to be true. Think about Windows Home vs Professional; it actually takes Microsoft much more work to offer both rather than offer just Professional. The experience is strictly worse for the user, and Microsoft makes less per sale on Home. So why do they even have a Home edition? It's because of market segmentation and pricing strategies. If it costs $70 marginal cost to manufacture a kindle, you will make some amount of money from each person that pays $79. What if $9 * # of potential purchases at that price point is less than the flat R&D costs? Then you can't make money at that price point. Now imagine all the kindles cost $100; a lot less people might buy it at $100 than would at $79. It's actually often in the best interest of the company if they could get half the people to pay $100, and anyone who would refuse to pay that to still buy it at $79. The only way to make that happen is to have to make some sort of differentiating factor that is minor enough so price sensitive people will still buy it, but that people who have the extra money will still pay the higher price. Windows professional is the same as basic for the vast majority of people, yet people still buy professional because to the people who are less price sensitive, it's worth it to not even hypothetically be missing features. In that way, they could easily be making $0 from the ads, or even negative income by showing the ads and still have it be a good idea to make a version with ads that costs less than the version without ads. It sometimes makes sense for a company to spend more money making a deliberately inferior version.
RexRollman 15y ago
I'm not surprised by the ghosting problems as I've read about this on Nook related forums as well. Maybe both companies should consider allowing people to alter how often the unit refreshes (although I believe this can be altered on the Nook STR if the unit has been rooted).
- bwooce 15y ago
  Kindle Firmware v4.0.1 gives you this.
avolcano 15y ago
This is kind of disappointing. I broke the screen on my Kindle 3 the other day, but wasn't too worried because I was planning on getting either this Kindle or the Touch anyways. I was thinking of buying the $79 Kindle today, since I didn't want to stop reading on the go for a month (I really don't like LCD screens) while waiting for the Touch to come out, but now I'm definitely rethinking it, especially due to the ghosting - sounds like it would get very annoying.
- fudge 15y ago
  I've read two books so far on the ad-free version of this Kindle, and I've seen the degraded quality when I study the page quality, but never while actually reading.
- bwooce 15y ago
  The Kindle 4.0.1 software update ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=hp_left_sib?ie=UTF8&nodeId=200774090 http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=hp_l... ) lets you control this.
  - avolcano 15y ago
    Oh, awesome! Definitely takes away one of my major worries about the new Kindle.
shuttlebrad 15y ago
We geeks typically place too much importance on the fidelity of the experience: on the idea that the kindle itself feels cheap, or the music from the (standard) iPhone headphones is poor quality. Most people just don't care - they want to listen to the same music as their friends, or get on with reading lots and lots of books. The fidelity of the experience is totally unimportant in 90% of cases.
danso 15y ago
From the article: The Kindle 1 was $400. This one’s $79 with ads. Knowing that this new Kindle costs less than the cover for my Kindle 2 is freeing: I can just carry it around uncased and unprotected in a (large) pocket, use it anywhere, and not worry about damaging an expensive electronic item, because it’s not. --- Astonishing how far prices and production have come down since the first Kindle, which still seems relatively new. Also, he paid $70+ for a Kindle case? I'm planning to buy a Kindle Touch and, being someone who carries his iPad and Macbook Air because, what the hell, they both fit easily in my DSLR camera bag, I'm going to really like carrying $400 less in electronics (I almost never use my ipad if I have a laptop with me, out of the home). But even if the Kindle Touch cost more, I wouldn't pay $70+ for a case...I don't think I've ever spent that much on a laptop or ipad case (I currently carry my Air in a padded Fedex envelope).
- savramescu 15y ago
  The ones with back-light are really helpful if you want to read in low-light. Generally those are the ones that cost more. If you do such things than they become quite useful. I own one and I use it all the time. It's way better than turning on the light in the bedroom and bother my girlfriend. Now she doesn't realize that I don't fall asleep until 3-4 AM. :)
- smackfu 15y ago
  I think this is the case he had for the Kindle 2, which does look pretty sweet, and that Kindle was a $300 product so a pricier case makes sense: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0026IBJNQ/ http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0026IBJNQ/ And even now, the official lighted leather Kindle 3 case is $60.
acabal 15y ago
It's too bad that the Kindle is getting so much attention (even if some is negative, like this piece), when there are many other better options. I had a Kindle 3 until I bought a Nook Simple Touch, and the NST blows the K3 out of the water in every respect: build quality, software interface, reading experience and options. The only downside might be the in-store selection, but for geeks like us (and increasingly regular folks, thanks to Calibre) it's a simple matter to break Amazon's DRM and convert to Epub. B&N has got to step up their game, because if sub-par products like the $79 Kindle keep stealing the limelight, they're never going to get anywhere.
- ugh 15y ago
  Read to the end. This is a very positive review of the new Kindle.
- pdubs 15y ago
  The best thing that I think B&N has going for it is their seemingly ongoing commitment to quality. I bought the original Nook shortly after its release and only recently decided to grab the NST to replace it (due almost entirely to simple gadget-envy). The Nook that I retired was a significantly better product than the Nook I originally bought. B&N continued to release relevant software updates for their original Nook for years. These weren't just bugfixes, but also major performance improvements, design improvements, and entirely new features. Basically, the Nook was, for me, the opposite of a disposable product because it kept getting better. That definitely built some brand-loyalty for me.
- ansy 15y ago
  The Kindle has one feature that the Nook does not have: Electronic delivery of personal documents. You can't email a word doc or PDF to myname@bn.com and have it converted and delivered to your device. You have to save it from a computer, convert it, plug in the Nook, and copy the file over. For book readers that might not matter. But it can be pretty attractive if you go beyond reading books by using something like Instapaper to "bookmark" articles throughout the day, then have them all automatically on the Kindle. This can be the feature that makes a huge difference once you start to use it.
gfunk911 15y ago
I bought the $79 Kindle the first day it was available. It's my first Kindle. I have an iPad, and I never felt like the Kindles were worth the money for the marginal additional benefit over an iPad. But for $79, who cares. I use it before bed and to carry around when I'd be worried about the iPad
- bad_user 15y ago
  The iPad is terrible for reading books. I was on a plane and got a headache while reading on the iPad - the screen glare is unbearable - I could see the reflection of the above light-source and my ugly face. And the device itself is a lot heavier than a Kindle, so you also get tired from holding it. After 2 hours of struggling I took out my netbook, which at least can sit in my lap.
  - ugh 15y ago
    Terrible for some people. I have no problem at all reading long texts on the iPad. It’s an ok compromise for me.
- brown9-2 15y ago
  I think you'll be really happy with the Kindle the first time you try to read on it outside in sunlight or with glare on the screen.
reaganing 15y ago
I have switched from the 3G+WiFi Kindle 3/Kindle Keyboard to the new $79 Kindle and am pretty happy with it. Gets rid of the stuff I didn't use (Audio playback, speakers, keyboard) to make a device even smaller. 3G is something I used so rarely I don't think I'll miss it. I decided to order the ad-supported model because I knew I could just pay Amazon $30 to turn them off if they bothered me. But it turns out I'm fine with them. They're not egregious and I only see them for the couple seconds it takes me to wake the Kindle and select a book. The ghosting is something I have noticed but it's something that is just as easy to ignore as the full-flash-every-turn issue on the prior models.
saturdaysaint 15y ago
I concur with his disappointment regarding the buttons. It's incredibly awkward to use with one hand, especially when lying down, which is a major design flaw IMO.
- sp4rki 15y ago
  This is a complaint I've been hearing from the majority of in real life people that own a Kindle3. Interestingly enough, I do own a Kindle3 and have used the previous versions and I like the next/prev page buttons on the Kindle3 better. I find that they're harder to press by accident, and although at first I found them awkward to use in the beginning, after going through half of the A Song of Ice and Fire saga I find them perfect for the way I hold my Kindle. I'm a big bookworm though (I spend from 8 to 16 hours a day programming, ie. looking at a screen... therefore I'm not really interested in watching TV and use books as my daily escape from reality mechanism) and going through three of those books, which by the way are humongous compared to "regular" books, took me about two weeks at about four hours of usage a day. The point being that I believe that after you have been using a Kindle for 60+ hours, I think that this type of buttons kind of grow on you. The statistician in me kind of want's to know what are the usage statistics for people that dislike the buttons and people that love them, though that could also be because I want confirmation that I'm not just a dude with a weird hand anatomy! In any case, how long have you been using your Kindle and what are your usage patterns? PD: I can't believe I'm so damn interested in freaking usage statistics on Kindle buttons...
wilder 15y ago
Does anyone know the mechanics of how the ads are pushed to the Kindle? Does Amazon observe user behavior and content of the ad supported Kindles in ways they didn't with the Kindle 3?
- adestefan 15y ago
  Your Kindle is tied to your Amazon account so the ads are based on your Amazon browsing and purchasing.
rgbrgb 15y ago
I really hate the idea of buying semi-disposable items, particularly electronics. It just becomes one more item in the landfill, one more thing to replace with a newly manufactured version. We're seeing that with computers and it's becoming a real problem. It isn't that I don't love new things but part of the reason that new things are so nice is because the things we're manufacturing are not designed to last. If only there was more money in environmentalism. Then maybe some smart hackernewsers would produce solutions.
- tsotha 15y ago
  >I really hate the idea of buying semi-disposable items, particularly electronics. There's no reason for a Kindle to be "semi-disposable". There isn't anything so cheap that it's going to wear out or break in a short period of time, as long as you take care of it.
  - rgbrgb 15y ago
    The review explicitly stated that the low end kindle was worth it because you could just buy another when it breaks.
    - tsotha 15y ago
      Yes, it does, but there's no reason this one is more likely to break than the others. The low end kindle may not last if you mistreat it, but that's true for just about anything.
Hominem 15y ago
I got one, this is my first Kindle. I am incredibly impressed than they produced something like this proced at $79 dollars. Instant delivery of thousands of book, supposed 2 months of battery life, extremely light, fits in my pocket. This is star-trek technology. And it costs $79.
- guywithabike 15y ago
  Minor correction: the base Kindle only advertises 1 month of battery life. Although, for most practical purposes, the difference between 1 month and 2 months is orders of magnitude less important than the difference between 1 week and 1 month.
brudgers 15y ago
>"Honestly, once I got into what I was reading, I forgot about the cheap, crappy page-turn buttons and the tacky ads on the sleep screen. Even the distorted unblinked text isn’t very noticeable when you’re engrossed in a book." A hardware implementation of the used paperback principle. As I've said before, ebooks are the killer slate application
jamii 15y ago
$79 in the US. £89 (~$140) in the UK. That's far a far bigger markup than can be explained by import tax / VAT. Anyone know why we have to pay almost double?
- jamesgeck0 15y ago
  You can't get the ad-supported version outside the US, so that's an automatic $30 markup.
AmazingBytecode 15y ago
$80 Ad-subsidized e-book reader feels cheep, has ads.
- neuroelectronic 15y ago
  no.
joejohnson 15y ago
I hope the Kindle Fire is better than this :(
ZeroGravitas 15y ago
Doesn't every iPod or iPhone charger since they ditched firewire for USB work with the kindle if you swap the usb leads? I'd have thought Marco's house would be overflowing with such USB power adaptors. The cable even seems color-matched for this.
OpenAmazing 15y ago
The ad-to-purchase flow is the killer feature of this device. (1) These are pre-loaded with your Amazon.com account (the one you bought it with). You don't have to sign in to it, it already knows who you are. (2) The first ad I saw was a "local deal" for a massage near where I live (for Ballard, in Seattle). This is minutes after first turning on the Kindle. No data entry. I was curious what the user experience was so I opened the ad. There was a Buy button for the massage ($26 for a 20 minute massage). I'm working on an order path / checkout flow for work right now so I was curious to see how they did it on the Kindle. I clicked the Buy button (again, I have yet to do any keyboard data entry on the device) and... I had bought. "Thanks for your purchase" read the screen and my iPhone beeped with the confirmation email. The Kindle comes pre-loaded with your Amazon account and everything is set up for one-click purchasing. Genius. (I debated forward the email to my wife, but just cancelled the order instead).

87 points by revorad 15y ago

"but you’ll regret purchasing an alternative the first time a book isn’t available there but is available for Kindle, which happens a lot." This has never happened to me. Everything I've encountered that's not available on Kobo is also not available on Kindle. Is this because I don't live in the US?

RexRollman 15y ago
Probably. Sadly, the book, music, and movies industries don't seem to be keeping up with the changes globalization have brought.
- TheAmazingIdiot 15y ago
  Not true. Globalization works well for the media (books, music, movie) industry. They can stratify and adjust rates to the destination country. Doing so, they can maximise profits for each area. Doing so also requires that users do not share amongst other areas, so 'zone controls' along with ill-suited laws are passed. Who globalisation does not work well for when concerning media is the rest of us. With exception of piracy, we are prevented from easily using globalisation in our advantage. Piracy is the great equaliser. It alone has scared media companies from releasing on a 2-3 year theater-to-public to as little as 1 month turnaround. And it is the ideal method to use to play your media format on any system (unlike restricted legit formats).
avolcano 15y ago
The big draw for me with the Kindle that doesn't seem to be available on its competitors is wireless document delivery - I used this with Instapaper, and now with Readability. Thanks to it, I never need to worry about plugging my Kindle into my PC to add articles I want to read. There's also some interesting content in the curated "Kindle Singles" section, cheap short stories, novellas, etc.
- achompas 15y ago
  Did you switch from Instapaper to Readability? If so, why? Did you want to support authors directly?
  - avolcano 15y ago
    Honestly, I switched because I liked the interface and the mobile web app more than I liked Instapaper's site and app. Readability's "readable view" is soooo much nicer than Instapaper's. Supporting authors is a nice bonus, though.
aidenn0 15y ago
This isn't a problem for me since there is a Calibre plugin that converts azw to epub. I just buy from wherever is cheapest, unless a DRM-free version is available for a few dollars more (Just because I can strip the DRM doesn't mean I don't want to vote with my dollars).

ChrisLTD 15y ago

Sad to see that the two most important buttons on the device haven't been improved. I'm glad I still have a working Kindle 2!

adestefan 15y ago
I think this is one of those times where what you've used first is what you like best. My first Kindle was a version 3 and thought the buttons were weird when I handled a relative's version 2 last Christmas.
- ChrisLTD 15y ago
  Good point!

achompas 15y ago

The lock screen shows a giant ad whenever the Kindle is off. Previous Kindles show tasteful pictures of classic authors when they’re off. This comment says more about how Marco sees technology than anything else. I can understand complaints about the page buttons, the cheap cable, and no power adapter. But tasteful pictures of classic authors? You're telling me that a creepy-looking picture of Emily Dickinson is a large improvement over an AT&T ad? Look at these screen savers and tell me any of them is worth paying an extra $50: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LasvphqtfV0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LasvphqtfV0 I agree with the sentiment: ads can be disgusting. I just don't understand how someone could complain when ads mean savings get passed on. Ads make the Kindle more affordable and take us a step closer to a future where everyone can afford technology. That's a trade-off I'm willing to make.

asolove 15y ago
I think the real question is: why is putting ads on our reading devices worth $50 to advertisers? We can be proud and say that such ads have no effect on our behavior, but statistics say otherwise. Certainly I see a lifestyle difference between friends who watch TV and those who don't, and I spend and desire much less now that I only occasionally watch movies on Netflix. So it's a Catch-22: you can save money on this purchase, but only by ultimately spending more on things you will later be convinced that you need.
- achompas 15y ago
  Agreed. No TV means no restaurant commercials, so I've been eating at home more often. On the other hand, I bought a reading light after seeing a Kindle ad for it. The Kindle has also saved $15 on Amazon purchases I would've made anyway, though. I dunno, it really depends on your taste for consumption.
- esrauch 15y ago
  > why is putting ads on our reading devices worth $50 to advertisers? We can be proud and say that such ads have no effect on our behavior, but statistics say otherwise. This does not actually have to be true. Think about Windows Home vs Professional; it actually takes Microsoft much more work to offer both rather than offer just Professional. The experience is strictly worse for the user, and Microsoft makes less per sale on Home. So why do they even have a Home edition? It's because of market segmentation and pricing strategies. If it costs $70 marginal cost to manufacture a kindle, you will make some amount of money from each person that pays $79. What if $9 * # of potential purchases at that price point is less than the flat R&D costs? Then you can't make money at that price point. Now imagine all the kindles cost $100; a lot less people might buy it at $100 than would at $79. It's actually often in the best interest of the company if they could get half the people to pay $100, and anyone who would refuse to pay that to still buy it at $79. The only way to make that happen is to have to make some sort of differentiating factor that is minor enough so price sensitive people will still buy it, but that people who have the extra money will still pay the higher price. Windows professional is the same as basic for the vast majority of people, yet people still buy professional because to the people who are less price sensitive, it's worth it to not even hypothetically be missing features. In that way, they could easily be making $0 from the ads, or even negative income by showing the ads and still have it be a good idea to make a version with ads that costs less than the version without ads. It sometimes makes sense for a company to spend more money making a deliberately inferior version.

RexRollman 15y ago

I'm not surprised by the ghosting problems as I've read about this on Nook related forums as well. Maybe both companies should consider allowing people to alter how often the unit refreshes (although I believe this can be altered on the Nook STR if the unit has been rooted).

bwooce 15y ago
Kindle Firmware v4.0.1 gives you this.

avolcano 15y ago

This is kind of disappointing. I broke the screen on my Kindle 3 the other day, but wasn't too worried because I was planning on getting either this Kindle or the Touch anyways. I was thinking of buying the $79 Kindle today, since I didn't want to stop reading on the go for a month (I really don't like LCD screens) while waiting for the Touch to come out, but now I'm definitely rethinking it, especially due to the ghosting - sounds like it would get very annoying.

fudge 15y ago
I've read two books so far on the ad-free version of this Kindle, and I've seen the degraded quality when I study the page quality, but never while actually reading.
bwooce 15y ago
The Kindle 4.0.1 software update ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=hp_left_sib?ie=UTF8&nodeId=200774090 http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=hp_l... ) lets you control this.
- avolcano 15y ago
  Oh, awesome! Definitely takes away one of my major worries about the new Kindle.

shuttlebrad 15y ago

We geeks typically place too much importance on the fidelity of the experience: on the idea that the kindle itself feels cheap, or the music from the (standard) iPhone headphones is poor quality. Most people just don't care - they want to listen to the same music as their friends, or get on with reading lots and lots of books. The fidelity of the experience is totally unimportant in 90% of cases.

danso 15y ago

From the article: The Kindle 1 was $400. This one’s $79 with ads. Knowing that this new Kindle costs less than the cover for my Kindle 2 is freeing: I can just carry it around uncased and unprotected in a (large) pocket, use it anywhere, and not worry about damaging an expensive electronic item, because it’s not. --- Astonishing how far prices and production have come down since the first Kindle, which still seems relatively new. Also, he paid $70+ for a Kindle case? I'm planning to buy a Kindle Touch and, being someone who carries his iPad and Macbook Air because, what the hell, they both fit easily in my DSLR camera bag, I'm going to really like carrying $400 less in electronics (I almost never use my ipad if I have a laptop with me, out of the home). But even if the Kindle Touch cost more, I wouldn't pay $70+ for a case...I don't think I've ever spent that much on a laptop or ipad case (I currently carry my Air in a padded Fedex envelope).

savramescu 15y ago
The ones with back-light are really helpful if you want to read in low-light. Generally those are the ones that cost more. If you do such things than they become quite useful. I own one and I use it all the time. It's way better than turning on the light in the bedroom and bother my girlfriend. Now she doesn't realize that I don't fall asleep until 3-4 AM. :)
smackfu 15y ago
I think this is the case he had for the Kindle 2, which does look pretty sweet, and that Kindle was a $300 product so a pricier case makes sense: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0026IBJNQ/ http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0026IBJNQ/ And even now, the official lighted leather Kindle 3 case is $60.

acabal 15y ago

It's too bad that the Kindle is getting so much attention (even if some is negative, like this piece), when there are many other better options. I had a Kindle 3 until I bought a Nook Simple Touch, and the NST blows the K3 out of the water in every respect: build quality, software interface, reading experience and options. The only downside might be the in-store selection, but for geeks like us (and increasingly regular folks, thanks to Calibre) it's a simple matter to break Amazon's DRM and convert to Epub. B&N has got to step up their game, because if sub-par products like the $79 Kindle keep stealing the limelight, they're never going to get anywhere.

ugh 15y ago
Read to the end. This is a very positive review of the new Kindle.
pdubs 15y ago
The best thing that I think B&N has going for it is their seemingly ongoing commitment to quality. I bought the original Nook shortly after its release and only recently decided to grab the NST to replace it (due almost entirely to simple gadget-envy). The Nook that I retired was a significantly better product than the Nook I originally bought. B&N continued to release relevant software updates for their original Nook for years. These weren't just bugfixes, but also major performance improvements, design improvements, and entirely new features. Basically, the Nook was, for me, the opposite of a disposable product because it kept getting better. That definitely built some brand-loyalty for me.
ansy 15y ago
The Kindle has one feature that the Nook does not have: Electronic delivery of personal documents. You can't email a word doc or PDF to myname@bn.com and have it converted and delivered to your device. You have to save it from a computer, convert it, plug in the Nook, and copy the file over. For book readers that might not matter. But it can be pretty attractive if you go beyond reading books by using something like Instapaper to "bookmark" articles throughout the day, then have them all automatically on the Kindle. This can be the feature that makes a huge difference once you start to use it.

gfunk911 15y ago

I bought the $79 Kindle the first day it was available. It's my first Kindle. I have an iPad, and I never felt like the Kindles were worth the money for the marginal additional benefit over an iPad. But for $79, who cares. I use it before bed and to carry around when I'd be worried about the iPad

bad_user 15y ago
The iPad is terrible for reading books. I was on a plane and got a headache while reading on the iPad - the screen glare is unbearable - I could see the reflection of the above light-source and my ugly face. And the device itself is a lot heavier than a Kindle, so you also get tired from holding it. After 2 hours of struggling I took out my netbook, which at least can sit in my lap.
- ugh 15y ago
  Terrible for some people. I have no problem at all reading long texts on the iPad. It’s an ok compromise for me.
brown9-2 15y ago
I think you'll be really happy with the Kindle the first time you try to read on it outside in sunlight or with glare on the screen.

reaganing 15y ago

I have switched from the 3G+WiFi Kindle 3/Kindle Keyboard to the new $79 Kindle and am pretty happy with it. Gets rid of the stuff I didn't use (Audio playback, speakers, keyboard) to make a device even smaller. 3G is something I used so rarely I don't think I'll miss it. I decided to order the ad-supported model because I knew I could just pay Amazon $30 to turn them off if they bothered me. But it turns out I'm fine with them. They're not egregious and I only see them for the couple seconds it takes me to wake the Kindle and select a book. The ghosting is something I have noticed but it's something that is just as easy to ignore as the full-flash-every-turn issue on the prior models.

saturdaysaint 15y ago

I concur with his disappointment regarding the buttons. It's incredibly awkward to use with one hand, especially when lying down, which is a major design flaw IMO.

sp4rki 15y ago
This is a complaint I've been hearing from the majority of in real life people that own a Kindle3. Interestingly enough, I do own a Kindle3 and have used the previous versions and I like the next/prev page buttons on the Kindle3 better. I find that they're harder to press by accident, and although at first I found them awkward to use in the beginning, after going through half of the A Song of Ice and Fire saga I find them perfect for the way I hold my Kindle. I'm a big bookworm though (I spend from 8 to 16 hours a day programming, ie. looking at a screen... therefore I'm not really interested in watching TV and use books as my daily escape from reality mechanism) and going through three of those books, which by the way are humongous compared to "regular" books, took me about two weeks at about four hours of usage a day. The point being that I believe that after you have been using a Kindle for 60+ hours, I think that this type of buttons kind of grow on you. The statistician in me kind of want's to know what are the usage statistics for people that dislike the buttons and people that love them, though that could also be because I want confirmation that I'm not just a dude with a weird hand anatomy! In any case, how long have you been using your Kindle and what are your usage patterns? PD: I can't believe I'm so damn interested in freaking usage statistics on Kindle buttons...

wilder 15y ago

Does anyone know the mechanics of how the ads are pushed to the Kindle? Does Amazon observe user behavior and content of the ad supported Kindles in ways they didn't with the Kindle 3?

adestefan 15y ago
Your Kindle is tied to your Amazon account so the ads are based on your Amazon browsing and purchasing.

rgbrgb 15y ago

I really hate the idea of buying semi-disposable items, particularly electronics. It just becomes one more item in the landfill, one more thing to replace with a newly manufactured version. We're seeing that with computers and it's becoming a real problem. It isn't that I don't love new things but part of the reason that new things are so nice is because the things we're manufacturing are not designed to last. If only there was more money in environmentalism. Then maybe some smart hackernewsers would produce solutions.

tsotha 15y ago
>I really hate the idea of buying semi-disposable items, particularly electronics. There's no reason for a Kindle to be "semi-disposable". There isn't anything so cheap that it's going to wear out or break in a short period of time, as long as you take care of it.
- rgbrgb 15y ago
  The review explicitly stated that the low end kindle was worth it because you could just buy another when it breaks.
  - tsotha 15y ago
    Yes, it does, but there's no reason this one is more likely to break than the others. The low end kindle may not last if you mistreat it, but that's true for just about anything.

Hominem 15y ago

I got one, this is my first Kindle. I am incredibly impressed than they produced something like this proced at $79 dollars. Instant delivery of thousands of book, supposed 2 months of battery life, extremely light, fits in my pocket. This is star-trek technology. And it costs $79.

guywithabike 15y ago
Minor correction: the base Kindle only advertises 1 month of battery life. Although, for most practical purposes, the difference between 1 month and 2 months is orders of magnitude less important than the difference between 1 week and 1 month.

brudgers 15y ago

>"Honestly, once I got into what I was reading, I forgot about the cheap, crappy page-turn buttons and the tacky ads on the sleep screen. Even the distorted unblinked text isn’t very noticeable when you’re engrossed in a book." A hardware implementation of the used paperback principle. As I've said before, ebooks are the killer slate application

jamii 15y ago

$79 in the US. £89 (~$140) in the UK. That's far a far bigger markup than can be explained by import tax / VAT. Anyone know why we have to pay almost double?

jamesgeck0 15y ago
You can't get the ad-supported version outside the US, so that's an automatic $30 markup.

AmazingBytecode 15y ago

$80 Ad-subsidized e-book reader feels cheep, has ads.

neuroelectronic 15y ago
no.

joejohnson 15y ago

I hope the Kindle Fire is better than this :(

ZeroGravitas 15y ago

Doesn't every iPod or iPhone charger since they ditched firewire for USB work with the kindle if you swap the usb leads? I'd have thought Marco's house would be overflowing with such USB power adaptors. The cable even seems color-matched for this.

OpenAmazing 15y ago

The ad-to-purchase flow is the killer feature of this device. (1) These are pre-loaded with your Amazon.com account (the one you bought it with). You don't have to sign in to it, it already knows who you are. (2) The first ad I saw was a "local deal" for a massage near where I live (for Ballard, in Seattle). This is minutes after first turning on the Kindle. No data entry. I was curious what the user experience was so I opened the ad. There was a Buy button for the massage ($26 for a 20 minute massage). I'm working on an order path / checkout flow for work right now so I was curious to see how they did it on the Kindle. I clicked the Buy button (again, I have yet to do any keyboard data entry on the device) and... I had bought. "Thanks for your purchase" read the screen and my iPhone beeped with the confirmation email. The Kindle comes pre-loaded with your Amazon account and everything is set up for one-click purchasing. Genius. (I debated forward the email to my wife, but just cancelled the order instead).