3 ms·

> Though David Foster Wallace’s famous journalistic argument against cruising had dampened my interest Uh, did anyone else click this link? If you did, you

> Though David Foster Wallace’s famous journalistic argument against cruising had dampened my interest Uh, did anyone else click this link? If you did, you find find a pdf that is effectively impossible to read on a mobile device. This seems ironic in an article about being able to read the fine print.

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
pvg 5y ago
If you haven't before, you should definitely read the DFW piece since it's more or less the best thing he's written.
digisign 5y ago
I read most of it, was a funny piece. It is a series of scans as a pdf. Clumsy but read easily on a desktop.

> Though David Foster Wallace’s famous jour­nal­istic argu­ment against cruising had damp­ened my interest Uh, did anyone else click this link? If you did, you

> Though David Foster Wallace’s famous jour­nal­istic argu­ment against cruising had damp­ened my interest Uh, did anyone else click this link? If you did, you

> Though David Foster Wallace’s famous journalistic argument against cruising had dampened my interest Uh, did anyone else click this link? If you did, you

> Though David Foster Wallace’s famous journalistic argument against cruising had dampened my interest Uh, did anyone else click this link? If you did, you