I am fond of an idea of making Bitcoin's energy usage less intense. IMO the article tries to distract our attention that the problem is not about enegry only bu

I am fond of an idea of making Bitcoin's energy usage less intense. IMO the article tries to distract our attention that the problem is not about enegry only but also as we know is one of the main reasons about semiconductor shortening. Appealing to the fact that Bitcoin uses less than 1% is very strange for me, it reminds me some debates about Linux will never outcome its 1% of users (which is maybe true but the fact has nothing to do in Windows vs Linux discussion).